CyberSec Research

Nikolov and Ullman asked whether k statistical queries on a universe of size T can be released under pure differential privacy with expected worst-coordinate error at the square-root rate suggested by known lower bounds. We prove their conjectured upper bound. For every database size n and privacy parameter $\varepsilon>0$, there is an $\varepsilon$-differentially private mechanism with expected error $O(\min\{1,\sqrt{\log(2T)\log(2k)/(\varepsilon n)}\})$. This matches the lower-bound dependence in the standard high-dimensional regimes where those bounds apply; the shifted logarithms and outer minimum make the upper bound valid without additional parameter assumptions. The construction starts from a selection-only private multiplicative weights transcript, then replaces its probability mass function by a distance-penalized likelihood envelope. To prove that the modification preserves accuracy, a likelihood-level Maurey argument upper-bounds each Hamming-ball maximum by a small family of auxiliary PMW laws. Renyi moment bounds control nearby balls, a direct mixture bound controls distant balls, and grouping radii at the privacy scale prevents an additional $1/\varepsilon$ factor in the error. The mechanism is information-theoretic. A companion Lean 4 development machine-checks the finite construction, pure privacy after deterministic decoding, and the displayed all-regimes upper bound.

Gabidulin codes are a rank metric analog of Reed-Solomon codes. Although these codes are used in different very efficient rank-based cryptosystems like the RQC cryptosystem or the Loidreau cryptosystem, there was no constant-time implementation of Gabidulin codes, when having a constant-time implementation is crucial for real-life development of cryptosystems. In this paper, we propose the first constant-time decoding algorithm of Augmented Gabidulin (AG) codes, a simple variation on Gabidulin codes where one adds zero columns to Gabidulin codes, and which contains the case of Gabidulin codes. These AG codes are used in practice in the most efficient variations of the RQC cryptosystem. We prove that AG code decoding can be achieved with quadratic complexity. We further present a constant-time algorithm for the left division of $q$-polynomials along with a complete description of the AG code decoding procedure. These algorithms are integrated into the RQC-Block-MS-AG scheme, and we evaluate the performance of our implementation through benchmarks. Our results show that our implementation outperforms the original RQC, though it remains approximately four times slower than HQC. However, it achieves ciphertexts and key sizes about four times smaller, highlighting an appealing trade-off between performance and compactness.

Edge Intelligence (EI) has emerged as a transformative model for mission-critical unmanned platforms, such as drone swarms, by enabling collaborative model training at the network periphery. However, the security of FL deployments depends on both network availability and robust client authentication mechanisms. This paper investigates a chained attack against drone-based FL systems that combines network-layer denial-of-service with credential-based impersonation. We demonstrate that an adversary can: (1) force legitimate drones offline using 802.11 deauthentication attacks, and (2) subsequently impersonate the disconnected drone using extracted credentials. Through a systematic literature review and empirical validation using the Flower framework on two distinct testbeds of Raspberry Pi and Jetsons, we quantify the impact of availability disruptions under Independent and Identically Distributed (IID) and Non-Independently and Identically Distributed (Non-IID) data distributions, and confirm that single-factor authentication permits post-disconnect impersonation. Our findings reveal that even short-term wireless interruptions cascade into substantial training instability, particularly under non-IID conditions, while the authentication gap enables adversaries to seamlessly replace disconnected nodes. We discuss the compounded implications for mission-critical drone deployments and outline directions for future defenses addressing both availability and authentication vulnerabilities.

LLM-driven autonomous agents are reshaping offensive security. Unlike traditional penetration-testing tooling -- deterministic, narrowly scoped, and operated by trained practitioners -- agentic security tools exhibit \textit{indeterminacy} along three independent dimensions. First, their actions are drawn from a non-deterministic policy whose outputs resist both ex-ante and ex-post explanation, frustrating incident attribution and pre-deployment safety review. Second, their impact is open-ended due to the non-deterministic actions, agency of utilized models, and opaque LLM supply-chains. Third, their user population is indeterminate in both size and required skill: the operating skill floor for using or developing offensive capabilities has dropped sharply. These three properties are linked thematically, but are not derivable from one another. Combined with the structural cost asymmetry between offense and defense, they enable the industrialization of offensive capability. The net short-term effect favors attackers, even if the same technology may, in the long run, democratize access to defensive practice. Existing dual-use cybersecurity and AI-ethics frameworks were not designed for this combination. Our work analyzes how moral attribution becomes diffuse between users, tool-makers, and third parties when employing autonomous AI agents for offensive security. We also examine the stakeholder impact of this technology and provide stratified recommendations.

Malware analysis demands rapid interpretation of complex detonation reports spanning filesystem, network, and process behaviours. While large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities for technical artifact interpretation, the opacity and escalating API costs of closed-weight frontier models motivate exploration of open-weight alternatives. However, many open-weight models are large, demanding significant compute resources and incurring non-trivial hosting costs that place them beyond reach for resource-constrained deployments. This paper investigates whether orchestrated ensembles of small language models (SLMs) can match or exceed single LLM performance on structured questions about malware detonation reports. We established baselines by testing eleven open-weight SLMs, three cyber security pre-trained models, and six frontier LLMs on Meta's CyberSecEval Malware Analysis benchmark. We then designed and evaluated four orchestration architectures: (i) a multi-agent pipeline that decomposes analysis into structured evidence-collection and reasoning stages, (ii) an adversarial debate framework in which two agents iteratively critique each other's reasoning, (iii) a hierarchical consultation system that pairs a general-purpose SLM with a cyber-specialised expert model, and (iv) a hybrid architecture that combines evidence-grounded pipelines with adversarial debate reasoning. The hybrid system (Qwen3-4B with Foundation-Sec-8B) achieved 35.30% overall accuracy, exceeding the strongest cyber-specialised baseline (22.54%) and the strongest ungrounded frontier baseline (34.77%); when given the same evidence pipeline, grounded Gemini remained the strongest configuration at 38.22%. These findings show that evidence-grounded orchestration can substantially improve the performance of collaborative SLMs for supporting interpretation of malware detonation reports.

Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) enables the acquisition of environmental information by leveraging wireless signals transmitted for communication purposes. In this paper, we utilize this capability to reconstruct the layout of objects surrounding multiple receivers. Ray tracing is then applied to the reconstructed environment to infer the propagation channels for various transmitter positions, thereby constructing a channel knowledge map (CKM). The CKM is then used to verify the position of a legitimate transmitter, authenticating it against an adversarial device attempting to impersonate it from a different location. This physical layer authentication (PLA) mechanism utilizes the approximate known position of the legitimate transmitter, obtained, for instance, from the network as in cross-layer authentication, to compare the channel estimated from the received signal with the corresponding CKM data. We evaluate the impact on the PLA performance of both ISAC-induced CKM reconstruction errors and receiver-side channel estimation noise, in terms of false alarm and missed detection probabilities. Finally, the proposed approach is validated using an ISAC dataset from the literature.

An increase in advanced Android malware requires the use of deep learning models, which can run on Android devices. But there is a trade-off between security and energy use, as strong detection models can drain the battery of devices fast. This work tests different Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) model configurations to balance malware detection performance and energy efficiency. In this work, we compared standard FP32 models with optimized INT8 quantized neural networks with different model depths using TUANDROMD and DREBIN datasets for both classification performance and energy consumption. The results show that INT8 quantization reduces model size by about 3.5 times with a decrease in energy consumption to 0.0189 mJ per inference, while maintaining more than 99.2\% detection accuracy. We found that shallow quantized architectures, such as 3-layer and 4-layer QNNs, reduce energy costs by improving throughput and shortening the time of CPU operating in a high-power state. This work shows that efficient malware protection can be achieved on resource-constrained smartphones and provides a foundation for Green AI in mobile security.

Key-Value (KV) cache reduces inference latency in large language models (LLMs). Traditional prefix-based reuse has low cache hit rates across inference requests because it requires exact token and position matches. To improve efficiency, recent system optimizations introduce position-independent KV reuse, allowing KV cache to be reused whenever identical text chunks appear, regardless of their position in the sequence. We show this design introduces a new threat, KV Cache Hijacking. Since KV caches are retrieved by token match but encode the context in which they were originally computed, the KV tied to a benign-looking token chunk may encode an attacker-controlled prefix. When later reused in a victim query, this contaminated KV silently hijacks the model's behavior, even if no attacker-controlled text appears in the input. We introduce HIJACKKV, the first attack framework that systematically exploits this vulnerability, demonstrating its severity and practicality. HIJACKKV optimizes an attacker-controlled prefix, so that the KV computed for a subsequent common benign text encodes the attacker's goal, while the text remains unchanged for future cache hits. HIJACKKV achieves an average 94% success rate in a single attempt, remains effective under realistic constraints including low hit rates (10%) and frequent recomputation (50%), persists over multi-turn interactions, and transfers across models in black-box settings. We further provide design insights for building secure KV reuse systems.

Agent safety is moving from content moderation toward preventing operational failures before tool-using agents act. We propose Janus, a foresight-oriented framework for long-horizon agent safety that trains guards to anticipate delayed risks from partial trajectories. Janus synthesizes diverse agent trajectories via multi-agent simulation and learns a shared policy with two coupled tasks: an anticipation task that forecasts safety-relevant futures and an adjudication task that decides safety from both the observed prefix and anticipated future. The two tasks are jointly optimized with CoAA-RL, which rewards forecasts by their utility for downstream safety judgment. The resulting guard model, Vanguard, blocks unsafe actions before execution. Across four agent-safety benchmarks, Vanguard improves average protection by 15.9 percentage points over baseline guards while increasing benign task completion by 5.1 percentage points.

Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where hidden triggers induce malicious outputs. Existing defenses generally fall into inference-time detection or training-time mitigation, but face two key limitations. First, they focus on fine-tuning-based backdoors (e.g., PEFT modules) and fail to address insidious model-editing attacks that bypass training pipelines. Second, they target simple classification settings and do not naturally extend to open-ended LLM generation and do not naturally extend to the open-ended generation characteristics of LLMs. Consequently, these methods focus on surface-level behavioral patterns while neglecting the deeper representational causes of malicious activations. This lack of mechanistic understanding forces defenses to depend on empirical heuristics, limiting their robustness, generality, and practical applicability in real-world LLM deployment. To bridge this gap, we introduce DeCNIP (Defense with Critical Neuron Isolation Pruning), which leverages representational analysis to identify and neutralize backdoors in a unified pipeline. Specifically, DeCNIP identifies trigger-like behaviors by optimizing a cross-entropy loss between harmful prompts with candidate tokens and benign inputs. This representational discovery exposes latent threats by uncovering mechanisms through which triggers hijack model weights. It then isolates Backdoor Critical Neurons (BCNs) and prunes them selectively to remove malicious influence while preserving model utility. Extensive evaluations on six open-source LLMs and two benchmark datasets demonstrate that DeCNIP achieves over 95% relative reduction in Attack Success Rate (ASR), outperforming seven state-of-the-art defenses with only 0.1% neuron intervention. Moreover, it maintains 97% of the model's performance on normal benchmarks, demonstrating its efficacy, robustness, and scalability.

Adversarial robustness is commonly evaluated with predefined attack ensembles, such as AutoAttack, at a single perturbation budget $\varepsilon$ and on a selective choice of perturbation norms. We argue this formulation is fundamentally limited. First, robustness--perturbation curves may intersect or decay at different rates across models, making single-$\varepsilon$ rankings unstable. Second, current ensembles provide no evidence of optimality, leaving an unknown gap to worst-case performance. Third, fixed attack configurations provide no systematic control over the trade-off between attack strength and evaluation cost. To address these limitations, we introduce a unified evaluation framework based on a comprehensive pool of minimum-norm attacks and robustness--perturbation curves across $\ell_0$, $\ell_1$, $\ell_2$ and $\ell_\infty$ norms. We define the attack frontier as the worst-case robustness estimate the attack pool produces against a model. We then formalize evaluation as a frontier-approximation problem, constructing minimum-norm attack ensembles, optimized subsets of the comprehensive pool, that approach the frontier under a controllable query budget, with larger budgets monotonically tightening the estimate. Furthermore, we define the defense frontier as the maximum robustness across the model set at each perturbation size. We finally propose the Defense Optimality Index to rank defenses by their gap to the defense frontier, providing a ranking without selecting a reference $\varepsilon$. On CIFAR-10 and ImageNet, our ensembles match or exceed AutoAttack on most defenses at every budget tier, at fixed and controllable query cost, offering practitioners a query-controlled, curve-based alternative to fixed-$\varepsilon$ evaluation.

Traditional pentesting uses reconnaissance at each step to uncover unseen weaknesses, build stronger attacks, and advance the objective; we argue that AI agents require the same treatment. We formalize agent reconnaissance by modeling the process and identifying the knowledge assets it seeks to extract: what they are, how they are used, and which agent weaknesses they exploit to give adversaries leverage in indirect prompt injection attacks. We instantiate these insights in Know Your Agent (KYA), a framework that automates black-box, reconnaissance-driven pentesting by probing agents, building target profiles, and using those profiles to craft stronger attacks. We evaluate KYA on agent-security benchmarks and a real-world coding agent, and release KYA, its benchmarks, and baseline implementations for reproducibility.

Most existing LLM safety evaluation and defense methods follow a static formulation: jailbreak vulnerabilities are evaluated with fixed attack methods, and guardrails are trained on fixed malicious prompt datasets. However, real-world adversaries continuously evolve their capabilities and expand the attack space. To address this challenge, we propose DARWIN, an evolutionary attack-defense framework that formulates jailbreaking as an open-ended evolution process and continuously updates guardrails through an evolving attack-defense loop. DARWIN-Attack is an evolutionary adversary that expands its capabilities through strategy discovery, mutation, selection, and feedback-driven composition. It collects strategies from broad external sources, generates new variants through self-reflection and genetic evolution, and retains effective strategies based on their performance against aligned LLMs. During attack execution, DARWIN-Attack adaptively selects and combines evolved strategies according to feedback from target LLMs and guardrails. Across frontier models and guardrails, it achieves state-of-the-art attack success rates, including nearly 100% on DeepSeek-V4-Pro and YuFeng-XGuard and over 90% on GPT-5.5. On the defense side, we introduce DARWIN-Guard, an online adversarial training paradigm that iteratively learns from emerging adversarial samples generated by DARWIN-Attack. To improve robustness without sacrificing utility, DARWIN-Guard jointly trains on malicious and benign disguised queries, encouraging the model to identify underlying intent rather than superficial attack patterns. DARWIN-Guard achieves an average unsafe recall of 91.6% across 12 safety benchmarks, outperforming strong guardrails such as YuFeng-XGuard and Nemotron Guard, while maintaining a nearly 100% pass rate on standard benign datasets.

Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) reports richly describe real-world attack processes, but their unstructured narratives cannot be directly used for automated attack-path reasoning. Existing CTI extraction methods focus on indicators, entities, or TTP labels without modeling the execution conditions and resulting states of each attack step, so the extracted knowledge supports neither state matching nor reachability analysis across multi-stage attack chains. This paper proposes an automated framework that extracts reachable attack chains by modeling each attack step as an attack unit of preconditions, an attack behavior, and postconditions. A multi-stage pipeline assisted by large language models (LLMs) extracts attack behavior skeletons, recovers their preconditions and postconditions, normalizes them into predefined predicates, and repairs broken dependencies; the resulting units are compiled into Datalog-style rules for attack-goal reachability reasoning. On a dataset of 20 CTI reports containing 334 human-validated annotated steps, our framework achieves higher annotated-step coverage than representative CTI extraction systems in recovering attack behaviors. Moreover, by explicitly generating preconditions and postconditions, it produces attack units that are more complete and consistent than those generated by end-to-end LLM baselines. On the extracted chains, Datalog inference reaches the specified attack goal in 19 of 20 reports, while backward search yields 34 attack paths under the generated rules. The source code and experimental artifacts are available in an anonymized repository. .

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where subtle perturbations to images or texts induce erroneous outputs. However, most text-based attacks are adapted from language-model-centric methods, in which the visual input is fixed during optimization, resulting in adversarial prompts that are tied to specific images and thus limiting their attack effectiveness. To this end, we first introduce a new research perspective: cross-image transferability for adversarial prompts. We then propose GhostPrompt, an adversarial prompt that is optimized once and reused to steer VLM outputs toward attacker-specified responses across diverse images. GhostPrompt employs a joint optimization that distills image-invariant adversarial features into the prompt by "worst-case" generation. Specifically, it alternates between constructing hard visual conditions for the current prompt and updating the prompt to remain effective under these conditions. Extensive experiments on prevalent VLMs verify that \ourmethod achieves an improvement of over 30% in attack success rates compared to state-of-the-art (SoTA) baselines, while reducing computation time by ~70%. Our code is avalable at https://github.com/Ye-ze-yu/GhostPrompt.

Federated Graph Neural Networks (FedGNNs) are highly vulnerable to backdoor poisoning, yet existing defenses typically rely on rule-based approaches that lack semantic understanding, making them vulnerable to stealthy triggers and harmful to benign structures. To solve this, we present FedLSG, the first framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) into federated graph backdoor defense. FedLSG introduces a graph and behavior to text grounding scheme that transforms local graph structures and client update behaviors into semantically rich natural language representations. The framework further adopts a lightweight student-teacher architecture. On the server side, a full scale LLM serves as a teacher, providing global contextual guidance and evaluating client updates during aggregation to identify potentially malicious participants. On the client side, a LoRA-based student is maintained to perform semantic reasoning, to suppress the influence of edges associated with backdoor triggers. By enabling semantic interpretation of both graph patterns and client behaviors, the framework adaptively incorporates rule-based signals into message passing and client aggregation for defense. Experiments demonstrate that FedLSG significantly improves resistance to backdoor attacks without compromising graph integrity.

Large language model (LLM) agents are vulnerable to security risks, such as prompt injection attacks from untrusted context that manipulate downstream reasoning and tool use. Existing secure-by-design approaches mitigate this risk by separating untrusted observations from privileged execution and careful control of information flow, but often degrade utility and require extensive task-specific engineering. We thus propose Twin Agent, a general privilege separation design pattern inspired by residual coding in the agent context. Twin Agent consists of two nearly symmetric agents: an Explore Agent that inspects untrusted information and a Safe Agent that executes privileged actions. The Explore Agent is conditioned on the Safe Agent's current context and communicates only compact hints to the Safe Agent about the next action to take. This design reduces the information needed to preserve task utility and thus achieves a better security--utility tradeoff, which we empirically verify by measuring how utility and attack success change as the length of hints varies. We evaluate Twin Agent on long-horizon software engineering tasks with SWE-bench Lite and on heterogeneous multi-tool interaction tasks with AgentDojo and DecodingTrust-Agent. Across both benchmarks, Twin Agent preserves high task utility while preventing prompt injection attacks, outperforming both undefended agents and privilege separation baselines.

Despite increasing awareness of cybersecurity risks, users continue to engage in insecure password practices, such as reusing passwords, choosing weak credentials, and neglecting security recommendations. The study explores the behavioral and cognitive factors that influence password decision-making by integrating insights from behavioral economics, particularly hyperbolic discounting, status quo bias, and present bias. We conducted a survey to analyze how people create, store and manage their passwords, examining whether security habits have improved over time in response to greater awareness. Our findings reveal that immediate convenience often outweighs long-term security considerations, leading users to prioritize memorability over strength. Additionally, we identify key psychological biases that contribute to security procrastination and resistance to adopting more secure authentication practices, such as password managers and multi-factor authentication. The study contributes to human-centered security by bridging the gap between security awareness and action, offering practical insights to design user-friendly authentication policies that align with real-world decision-making tendencies.