CyberSec Research

Logical vulnerabilities in software stem from flaws in program logic rather than memory safety, which can lead to critical security failures. Although existing automated program repair techniques primarily focus on repairing memory corruption vulnerabilities, they struggle with logical vulnerabilities because of their limited semantic understanding of the vulnerable code and its expected behavior. On the other hand, recent successes of large language models (LLMs) in understanding and repairing code are promising. However, no framework currently exists to analyze the capabilities and limitations of such techniques for logical vulnerabilities. This paper aims to systematically evaluate both traditional and LLM-based repair approaches for addressing real-world logical vulnerabilities. To facilitate our assessment, we created the first ever dataset, LogicDS, of 86 logical vulnerabilities with assigned CVEs reflecting tangible security impact. We also developed a systematic framework, LogicEval, to evaluate patches for logical vulnerabilities. Evaluations suggest that compilation and testing failures are primarily driven by prompt sensitivity, loss of code context, and difficulty in patch localization.

Autonomous AI agents are rapidly transitioning from experimental tools to operational infrastructure, with projections that 80% of enterprise applications will embed AI copilots by the end of 2026. As agents gain the ability to execute real-world actions (reading files, running commands, making network requests, modifying databases), a fundamental security gap has emerged. The dominant approach to agent safety relies on prompt-level guardrails: natural language instructions that operate at the same abstraction level as the threats they attempt to mitigate. This paper argues that prompt-based safety is architecturally insufficient for agents with execution capability and introduces Parallax, a paradigm for safe autonomous AI execution grounded in four principles: Cognitive-Executive Separation, which structurally prevents the reasoning system from executing actions; Adversarial Validation with Graduated Determinism, which interposes an independent, multi-tiered validator between reasoning and execution; Information Flow Control, which propagates data sensitivity labels through agent workflows to detect context-dependent threats; and Reversible Execution, which captures pre-destructive state to enable rollback when validation fails. We present OpenParallax, an open-source reference implementation in Go, and evaluate it using Assume-Compromise Evaluation, a methodology that bypasses the reasoning system entirely to test the architectural boundary under full agent compromise. Across 280 adversarial test cases in nine attack categories, Parallax blocks 98.9% of attacks with zero false positives under its default configuration, and 100% of attacks under its maximum-security configuration. When the reasoning system is compromised, prompt-level guardrails provide zero protection because they exist only within the compromised system; Parallax's architectural boundary holds regardless.

Generalized Reed-Solomon (GRS) and Gabidulin codes have been proposed for various code-based cryptosystems, though most such schemes without elaborate disguising techniques have been successfully attacked. Both code classes are prominent examples of the isometric families of (generalized) skew and linearized Reed-Solomon ((G)SRS and (G)LRS) codes which are obtained as evaluation codes from skew polynomials. Both GSRS and GLRS codes share the advantage of achieving the maximum possible error-decoding radius and thus promise smaller key sizes than e.g. Classic McEliece. We investigate whether these generalizations can avoid the known structural attacks on GRS and Gabidulin codes. In particular, we prove that both GSRS and GLRS codes decompose into GRS subcodes and are thus efficiently distinguishable from random codes with a square code method. This applies to all parameters for which the code length $n$ and its dimension $k$ over the field $\mathbb{F}_{q^m}$ satisfy $m + 1 < k < n - \tfrac{1}{2} (m^2 + 3m)$. The distinguishability extends to GSRS and GLRS codes with Hamming-isometric disguising. We further relate these findings to existing distinguishers for GRS, Gabidulin, and LRS codes, and extend known results on duals of SRS and LRS codes to the generalized setting allowing nonzero column multipliers. Finally, we provide explicit transformations between GSRS and GLRS codes, clarifying the algebraic relationship between the skew and linearized frameworks.

Binary decompilation is a critical reverse engineering task aimed at reconstructing high-level source code from stripped executables. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown promise, they often suffer from "logical hallucinations" and "semantic misalignment" due to the irreversible semantic loss during compilation, resulting in generated code that fails to re-execute. In this study, we propose Cognitive Decompiler Refinement with Robustness (CoDe-R), a lightweight two-stage code refinement framework. The first stage introduces Semantic Cognitive Enhancement (SCE), a Rationale-Guided Semantic Injection strategy that trains the model to recover high-level algorithmic intent alongside code. The second stage introduces a Dynamic Dual-Path Fallback (DDPF) mechanism during inference, which adaptively balances semantic recovery and syntactic stability via a hybrid verification strategy. Evaluation on the HumanEval-Decompile benchmark demonstrates that CoDe-R (using a 1.3B backbone) establishes a new State-of-the-Art (SOTA) in the lightweight regime. Notably, it is the first 1.3B model to exceed an Average Re-executability Rate of 50.00%, significantly outperforming the baseline and effectively bridging the gap between efficient models and expert-level performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/Theaoi/CoDe-R.

With increasing emphasis on transparency in digital governance, users expect more than silence when their access requests are denied by a system. However, authorization methods are notorious for their inability to provide any form of meaningful feedback under such situations. This paper shows a direction towards how the problem of explainability can be mitigated in the context of Attribute-based Access Control (ABAC), arguably the most researched topic in access control in recent years. We introduce EXTree, which represents ABAC policies optimized for both fast evaluation (Efficiency) and human-centric feedback (Explainability) in the form of a tree. Two strategic dimensions are investigated, namely, Feedback Evaluation Strategies - how to craft actionable explanations when access is denied, and Tree Construction Strategies - how the policy trees should be structured for efficient yet interpretable decisions. Through extensive experiments, we compare entropy-based, changeability-based, and randomly generated trees across multiple configurations. Our results demonstrate that EXTree, built for efficiency and interpretability, can bridge the gap between complex authorization logic and human understanding.

Radio frequency fingerprints (RFFs) enable secure wireless authentication but struggle in open-set scenarios with unknown devices and varying channels. Existing methods face challenges in generalization and incur high computational costs. We propose a lightweight, self-adaptive RFF extraction framework using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). By pretraining LoRA modules per environment, our method enables fast adaptation to unseen channel conditions without full retraining. During inference, a weighted combination of LoRAs dynamically enhances feature extraction. Experimental results demonstrate a 15% reduction in equal error rate (EER) compared to non-finetuned baselines and an 83% decrease in training time relative to full fine-tuning, using the same training dataset. This approach provides a scalable and efficient solution for open-set RFF authentication in dynamic wireless vehicular networks.

Adversarial training (AT) is an effective defense for large language models (LLMs) against jailbreak attacks, but performing AT on LLMs is costly. To improve the efficiency of AT for LLMs, recent studies propose continuous AT (CAT) that searches for adversarial inputs within the continuous embedding space of LLMs during AT. While CAT has achieved empirical success, its underlying mechanism, i.e., why adversarial perturbations in the embedding space can help LLMs defend against jailbreak prompts synthesized in the input token space, remains unknown. This paper presents the first theoretical analysis of CAT on LLMs based on in-context learning (ICL) theory. For linear transformers trained with adversarial examples from the embedding space on in-context linear regression tasks, we prove a robust generalization bound that has a negative correlation with the perturbation radius in the embedding space. This clearly explains why CAT can defend against jailbreak prompts from the LLM's token space. Further, the robust bound shows that the robustness of an adversarially trained LLM is closely related to the singular values of its embedding matrix. Based on this, we propose to improve LLM CAT by introducing an additional regularization term, which depends on singular values of the LLM's embedding matrix, into the objective function of CAT. Experiments on real-world LLMs demonstrate that our method can help LLMs achieve a better jailbreak robustness-utility tradeoff. The code is available at https://github.com/fshp971/continuous-adv-icl.

While Federated Learning (FL) mitigates direct data exposure, the resulting trained models remain susceptible to membership inference attacks (MIAs). This paper presents an empirical evaluation of Differential Privacy (DP) as a defense mechanism against MIAs in FL, leveraging the environment of the 2025 NIST Genomics Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning (PPFL) Red Teaming Event. To improve inference accuracy, we propose a stacking attack strategy that ensembles seven black-box estimators to train a meta-classifier on prediction probabilities and cross-entropy losses. We evaluate this methodology against target models under three privacy configurations: an unprotected convolutional neural network (CNN, $ε=\infty$), a low-privacy DP model ($ε=200$), and a high-privacy DP model ($ε=10$). The attack outperforms all baselines in the No DP and Low Privacy settings and, critically, maintains measurable membership leakage at $ε=200$ where a single-signal LiRA baseline collapses. Evaluated on an independent third-party benchmark, these results provide an empirical characterisation of how stacking-based inference degrades across calibrated DP tiers in FL.

Cloud networks increasingly rely on machine learning based Network Intrusion Detection Systems to defend against evolving cyber threats. However, real-world deployments are challenged by limited labeled data, non-stationary traffic, and adaptive adversaries. While semi-supervised learning can alleviate label scarcity, most existing approaches implicitly assume benign and stationary unlabeled traffic, leading to degraded performance in adversarial cloud environments. This paper proposes a robust semi-supervised temporal learning framework for cloud intrusion detection that explicitly addresses adversarial contamination and temporal drift in unlabeled network traffic. Operating on flow-level data, this framework combines supervised learning with consistency regularization, confidence-aware pseudo-labeling, and selective temporal invariance to conservatively exploit unlabeled traffic while suppressing unreliable samples. By leveraging the temporal structure of network flows, the proposed method improves robustness and generalization across heterogeneous cloud environments. Extensive evaluations on publicly available datasets (CIC-IDS2017, CSE-CIC-IDS2018, and UNSW-NB15) under limited-label conditions demonstrate that the proposed framework consistently outperforms state-of-the-art supervised and semi-supervised network intrusion detection systems in detection performance, label efficiency, and resilience to adversarial and non-stationary traffic.

Passwords still remain a dominant authentication method, yet their security is routinely subverted by predictable user choices and large-scale credential leaks. Automated password guessing is a key tool for stress-testing password policies and modeling attacker behavior. This paper applies LLM-driven evolutionary computation to automatically optimize prompts for the LLM password guessing framework. Using OpenEvolve, an open-source system combining MAP-Elites quality-diversity search with an island population model we evolve prompts that maximize cracking rate on a RockYou-derived test set. We evaluate three configurations: a local setup with Qwen3 8B, a single compact cloud model Gemini-2.5 Flash, and a two-model ensemble of frontier LLMs. The approach raises the cracking rates from 2.02\% to 8.48\%. Character distribution analysis further confirms how evolved prompts produce statistically more realistic passwords. Automated prompt evolution is a low-barrier yet effective way to strengthen LLM-based password auditing and underlining how attack pipelines show tendency via automated improvements.

Prompt injection has emerged as a critical security threat to large language models (LLMs), yet existing studies predominantly focus on single-dimensional attack strategies, such as semantic rewriting or character-level obfuscation, which fail to capture the combined effects of multi-space perturbations in realistic scenarios. In addition, systematic black-box robustness evaluations of recent Chinese LLMs, such as DeepSeek, remain limited. To address these gaps, we propose PromptFuzz-SC, a semantic-character dual-space mutation framework for evaluating LLM robustness against prompt injection. The framework integrates semantic transformations (e.g., paraphrasing and word-order perturbation) with character-level obfuscation (e.g., zero-width insertion and encoding-based mutation), forming a unified and extensible mutation operator library. A hybrid search strategy combining epsilon-greedy exploration and hill-climbing refinement is adopted to efficiently discover high-quality adversarial prompts. We further introduce a unified evaluation protocol based on three metrics: misuse success rate (MSR), Average Queries to Success (AQS), and Stealth. Experimental results on DeepSeek demonstrate that dual-space mutation achieves the strongest overall attack performance among the evaluated strategies, attaining the highest mean MSR (0.189), peak MSR (0.375), and mean Stealth. Compared with semantic-only and character-only mutation, it improves mean MSR by 12.5% and 5.6%, respectively. While not consistently minimizing query cost, the proposed method achieves competitive best-case efficiency and maintains strong imperceptibility, indicating a more favorable balance between attack effectiveness and concealment. These findings highlight the importance of composite mutation strategies for robust red-teaming of LLMs and provide practical insights for the design of multi-layer defense mechanisms.

Specification gaming under Reinforcement Learning (RL) is known to cause LLMs to develop sycophantic, manipulative, or deceptive behavior, yet the conditions under which this occurs remain unclear. We train 11 instruction-tuned LLMs (0.5B--14B) with on-policy RL across 3 environments and find that model size acts as a safety buffer in some environments but enables greater harmful exploitation in others. Controlled ablations trace this reversal to environment-specific features such as role framing and implicit gameability cues. We further show that most safety benchmarks do not predict RL-induced misalignment, except in the case of Sycophancy scores when the exploit relies on inferring the user's preference. Finally, we find that on-policy RL preserves a safety buffer inherent in the model's own generation distribution, one that is bypassed during off-policy settings.

Text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models have achieved remarkable success in image synthesis, but their reliance on large-scale data and open ecosystems introduces serious backdoor security risks. Existing defenses, particularly input-level methods, are more practical for deployment but often rely on observable anomalies that become unreliable under stealthy, semantics-preserving trigger designs. As modern backdoor attacks increasingly embed triggers into natural inputs, these methods degrade substantially, raising a critical question: can more stable, implicit, and trigger-agnostic differences between benign and backdoor inputs be exploited for detection? In this work, we address this challenge from an active probing perspective. We introduce controlled scaling perturbations on cross-attention and uncover a novel phenomenon termed Cross-Attention Scaling Response Divergence (CSRD), where benign and backdoor inputs exhibit systematically different response evolution patterns across denoising steps. Building on this insight, we propose SET, an input-level backdoor detection framework that constructs response-offset features under multi-scale perturbations and learns a compact benign response space from a small set of clean samples. Detection is then performed by measuring deviations from this learned space, without requiring prior knowledge of the attack or access to model training. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SET consistently outperforms existing baselines across diverse attack methods, trigger types, and model settings, with particularly strong gains under stealthy implicit-trigger scenarios. Overall, SET improves AUROC by 9.1% and ACC by 6.5% over the best baseline, highlighting its effectiveness and robustness for practical deployment.

Organisations increasingly outsource privacy-sensitive data transformations to cloud providers, yet no practical mechanism lets the data owner verify that the contracted algorithm was faithfully executed. VeriX-Anon is a multi-layered verification framework for outsourced Target-Driven k-anonymization combining three orthogonal mechanisms: deterministic verification via Merkle-style hashing of an Authenticated Decision Tree, probabilistic verification via Boundary Sentinels near the Random Forest decision boundary and exact-duplicate Twins with cryptographic identifiers, and utility-based verification via Explainable AI fingerprinting that compares SHAP value distributions before and after anonymization using the Wasserstein distance. Evaluated on three cross-domain datasets against Lazy (drops 5 percent of records), Dumb (random splitting, fake hash), and Approximate (random splitting, valid hash) adversaries, VeriX-Anon correctly detected deviations in 11 of 12 scenarios. No single layer achieved this alone. The XAI layer was the only mechanism that caught the Approximate adversary, succeeding on Adult and Bank but failing on the severely imbalanced Diabetes dataset where class imbalance suppresses the SHAP signal, confirming the need for adaptive thresholding. An 11-point k-sweep showed Target-Driven anonymization preserves significantly more utility than Blind anonymization (Wilcoxon $p = 0.000977$, Cohen's $d = 1.96$, mean F1 gap $+0.1574$). Client-side verification completes under one second at one million rows. The threat model covers three empirically evaluated profiles and one theoretical profile (Informed Attacker) aware of trap embedding but unable to defeat the cryptographic salt. Sentinel evasion probability ranges from near-zero for balanced datasets to 0.52 for imbalanced ones, a limitation the twin layer compensates for in every tested scenario.

Cryptographic agility is a key prerequisite for maintaining the long-term security of digital communication, particularly in light of the transition to post-quantum cryptography. To systematically assess this capability, Hohm et al. proposed the Crypto Agility Maturity Model (CAMM). In this work, we present the first evaluation of the CAMM against established design principles for maturity models. Our analysis reveals that the CAMM only partially satisfies these principles: its scope and target groups remain ambiguous; acceptance criteria are insufficiently operationalized, limiting verifiability and replicability; and dependency relations exhibit redundancies, cycles, and omissions. Applying the CAMM to a simple real-world scenario further confirmed these issues, as several requirements at higher maturity levels proved inapplicable or unclear. Based on these findings, we propose concrete improvements to the CAMM to enable more consistent and reliable assessments of cryptographic agility.

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) promise efficient, clean and cost-effective transportation systems, but their reliance on sensors, wireless communications, and decision-making systems makes them vulnerable to cyberattacks and physical threats. This chapter presents novel design techniques to strengthen the security and resilience of AVs. We first provide a taxonomy of potential attacks across different architectural layers, from perception and control manipulation to Vehicle-to-Any (V2X) communication exploits and software supply chain compromises. Building on this analysis, we present an AV Resilient architecture that integrates redundancy, diversity, and adaptive reconfiguration strategies, supported by anomaly- and hash-based intrusion detection techniques. Experimental validation on the Quanser QCar platform demonstrates the effectiveness of these methods in detecting depth camera blinding attacks and software tampering of perception modules. The results highlight how fast anomaly detection combined with fallback and backup mechanisms ensures operational continuity, even under adversarial conditions. By linking layered threat modeling with practical defense implementations, this work advances AV resilience strategies for safer and more trustworthy autonomous vehicles.

Classical computability theory tells us that self-modifying code (SMC) on a deterministic universal Turing machine can be simulated by non-SMC code on the same model. That abstraction, however, omits the external timing inputs, concurrency, and microarchitectural state that dominate practical execution on modern processors. We argue that once timing, ordering, and self-introspective effects are treated as observables, a practically faithful non-SMC reproduction of timed SMC becomes detectably expensive on commodity systems. We present a tamper-proofing model that combines introspective and polymorphic SMC, reliable clocks, and runtime timing predicates to bind integrity checks to execution behavior. We distinguish static and dynamic SMC generation, characterize the timing semantics needed to avoid catastrophic pipeline clears, and give x86-64 design primitives for checksum-driven self-patching. We also report timer measurements, performance comparisons, and performance-monitoring counter evidence showing that careful engineering -- especially loop unrolling and cross-page modification -- substantially reduces the overhead of SMC while preserving its tamper-detection value. The paper concludes with an efficiency analysis, a threat model, and deployment guidance for trusted code executing in untrusted environments.

Safety-aligned large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world pipelines, yet this deployment also enlarges the supply-chain attack surface: adversaries can distribute backdoored checkpoints that behave normally under standard evaluation but jailbreak when a hidden trigger is present. Recent post-hoc weight-editing methods offer an efficient approach to injecting such backdoors by directly modifying model weights to map a trigger to an attacker-specified response. However, existing methods typically optimize a token-level mapping that forces an affirmative prefix (e.g., ``Sure''), which does not guarantee sustained harmful output -- the model may begin with apparent agreement yet revert to safety-aligned refusal within a few decoding steps. We address this reliability gap by shifting the backdoor objective from surface tokens to internal representations. We extract a steering vector that captures the difference between compliant and refusal behaviors, and compile it into a persistent weight modification that activates only when the trigger is present. To preserve stealthiness and benign utility, we impose a null-space constraint so that the injected edit remains dormant on clean inputs. The method is efficient, requiring only a small set of examples and admitting a closed-form solution. Across multiple safety-aligned LLMs and jailbreak benchmarks, our method achieves high triggered attack success while maintaining non-triggered safety and general utility.